DDoS Tools Flourish, Give Attackers Many Options


Securing The Super Bowls Of Sports
(click image for larger view and for slideshow)
How hard is it to launch a distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attack?

Arguably, the hacktivist collective Anonymous has made launching DDoS attacks look easy, due to its high-profile DDoS campaigns against everyone from PayPal and MasterCard to the FBI and Department of Justice. In addition, Anonymous offered the promise of one-click attacks via its low orbit ion cannon (LOIC) DDoS attack tool.

While LOIC was great at building buzz for Anonymous, it also provided valuable intelligence for law enforcement agencies, since many users apparently didn’t realize that the tool alone wouldn’t obscure their IP address from the sites they attacked.

[ They may be impossible to prevent, but 10 Strategies To Fight Anonymous DDoS Attacks can help you mitigate an attack in progress. ]

But LOIC, it turns out, is just one of many DDoS tools now available for online use, downloading, or renting. Indeed, there’s now a thriving DDoS tool and botnet ecosystem that includes “single user flooding tools, small host booters, shell booters, remote access Trojans (RATs) with flooding capabilities, simple DDoS bots, complex DDoS bots, and some commercial DDoS services,” said Curt Wilson, a research analyst at Arbor Networks, in a blog post. “Many types of threats can be blended into any given tool in order to make the tool more attractive and financially lucrative”–as in, profitable for whoever’s renting out the DDoS capabilities.

All told, Wilson recently counted 55 different DDoS tools, which are still just a fraction of what’s publicly and commercially available. Of course, some of these tools are more dangerous than others. For example, Fg Power DDOSER is designed to flood a gaming competitor with packets, thus slowing their connection speed or knocking them offline, although the DDoS toolkit also includes a Firefox password stealer, said Wilson. Another relatively simple tool, Silent-DDoSer, can launch UDP, SYN, and HTTP attacks, and also offers “triple-DES and RC4 encryption, IPv6 capabilities, and password stealing functions,” he said.

At the other end of the spectrum, meanwhile, there are a number of complex DDoS toolkits and related bots, and typically also Web-based command-and-control interfaces. These toolkits sport names such as Darkness/Optima, DeDal, Dirt Jumper, G-Bot, and Russian Armageddon. Finally, services such as Death DDoS Service and Totoro offer commercial DDoS options, meaning that rather than running the tools themselves, attackers can just outsource the job.

Why launch a DDoS attack? Many times, as with botnets, the goal is to steal valuable information, such as financial details. But such attacks can also be used for business purposes. “While there are numerous motives for DDoS, such as revenge, extortion, competitive advantage, and protest, many of the commercial DDoS services emphasize competitive advantage with wording devoted to taking down a competitor,” said Wilson. “More troubling is the recently reported distracting use of DDoS to flood networks after financial theft has been performed via a banking Trojan in order to allow the thieves extended access to the loot.”

But some of those drivers may be changing. In fact, half of DDoS attacks are now ideologically driven, according to a new study of 2011 attacks conducted by Arbor. “Ideologically and politically motivated DDoS attacks have dramatically risen as the perceived root cause of large-scale DDoS attacks on the Internet,” said Roland Dobbins, Asia-Pacific solutions architect for Arbor Networks, via phone.

Previously, he said, service providers and network operators saw the leading causes of DDoS attacks as “nihilism, vandalism, criminal activity, and gaming activity–people unhappy with their gaming comrades, who DDoS them,” he said. “Then there’s criminal extortion, where people will demand ‘protection money’ to allow a DDoS’d site to come back up.”

Another interesting finding–with DDoS implications–from Arbor’s new research is that wireless network operators’ security capabilities appear to lag their wireline counterparts by about 10 years, principally in terms of the visibility they do or don’t have into what’s happening on their TCP/IP networks, which now serve an enormous number of smartphone users and their increasing data consumption requirements. “Wireless operators around the world had become what I like to call ‘accidental ISPs’ over the last four years, since the introduction of the iPhone,” Dobbins said.

“Some of the larger providers have really done a tremendous job of making a transition, understanding that TCP/IP is really the future,” he said. “But there are a number of wireless providers around the world at which the senior management doesn’t agree with the proposition that their primary business is now Internet access, and that voice…will become [only] packetized TCP/IP.”

At those organizations, knowledge of TCP/IP security can lag, which leaves the telecommunications carriers at greater risk of not being able to cope with DDoS attacks launched at their wireless networks. “There’s still this focus on minutes versus packets. It’s going to take a lot of time for the industry to make that conceptual shift,” said Dobbins.

There are no silver bullets when it comes to protecting company and customer data from loss or theft, but there are technological and procedural systems that will go a long way toward preventing a WikiLeaks-like data dump. Download our How To Prevent An Online Data Dump report. (Free registration required.)

Article source: http://feeds.informationweek.com/click.phdo?i=0d1b811bf128aa7fbe7cc1b952bbc7a9

  1. No comments yet.
(will not be published)